Summary of the Debate Competition on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Artificial Intelligence (Ap

 

1. The advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence

The 2017 Chinese Monthly AB Volume 2 set of questions has been newly released, welcome to group purchase!! Simulated test questions flying all over the sky, how to deal with them? Two sets of questions for Chinese monthly magazines, must do! (Details stamped here) Pricing 10 yuan, group purchase 5 yuan Consultation phone number: 02085213337, WeChat 13602424805 (mobile)

2. Advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence

The second "Shenzhen Hong Kong Cup" Debate Competition Final Debate Speech Appreciation Debate Question: Does Artificial Intelligence Have More Benefits or Disadvantages for Human Development? Peng Gongjin, Leader of Chinese Language Teaching and Research at Nantou Middle School in Shenzhen, provided a manuscript. The positive side is Nantou Middle School. The negative side is Guangming Senior (according to the recording). The positive side is: Thank you, Chairman. Greetings to everyone present. Regarding today's debate question, our view is that artificial intelligence has more advantages than disadvantages for human development.

3. Debate on the pros and cons of artificial intelligence

It is clear at the beginning that the definition of advanced AI is based on mathematics, logic and statistics. It is an operating system that gains learning ability through experience accumulation, so as to help people carry out certain work. AI has essential differences and fundamental boundaries with human intelligence. AI is a physical process, not a biological process; It simulates a certain behavior of humans, rather than the behavior itself. It does not possess human self-awareness and cannot form a subjective event.

4. Discussion Paper on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Artificial Intelligence

The advantages of artificial intelligence are only that in certain fields, it is more accurate, stable, and has stronger computing power than humans. Next, we will demonstrate our viewpoint from the following three points. Firstly, artificial intelligence makes human life better. For example, the medical application of artificial intelligence benefits the general public. Doctors may find it difficult to maintain the latest treatment plans and methods, and may not be able to understand all medical examples.

5. Advantages and Disadvantages of Artificial Intelligence PPT

Artificial intelligence can analyze a large amount of data in a short period of time, accurately determine symptoms, and find the best treatment plan to provide people with the best treatment. Moreover, the widely used unmanned driving not only reduces people's burden, but also greatly reduces accident rates. For example, the SIR handwritten version system and biometric recognition system of Apple's system are all applications of artificial intelligence, Both have significantly improved the quality of human life.

6. Advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence

Secondly, artificial intelligence promotes social progress and further liberates humans. With the application of artificial intelligence, the production efficiency of various industries has greatly improved, and human wealth has rapidly increased in geometric form, providing a solid material foundation for a better life for humanity. Artificial intelligence liberates humans from repetitive and meaningless work, and liberates them from high-risk work, giving them more freedom of choice, So as to invest more energy into more meaningful fields.

7. Advantages and Disadvantages of Artificial Intelligence: 800 Word High School Model Essay

Artificial intelligence has also enabled humans to break through the bottleneck of development. For example, artificial intelligence can explore places beyond human reach such as outer space, mountains, seas, glaciers, and rivers. It can enable efficient analysis and rational use of complex big data, allowing people to explore deeper levels of knowledge. With artificial intelligence, humans have transcended their own limitations and achieved further liberation.

8. Advantages and Disadvantages of Artificial Intelligence Writing 800 words

Thirdly, artificial intelligence has promoted the rational progress of human beings, which can in turn promote the development of human beings. The research and development process of artificial intelligence itself has the need and characteristics to study human brain cognition and function, and enables humans to learn learning methods in this process, thereby enhancing their logical thinking ability. Artificial intelligence has updated humans.

9. Advantages and Disadvantages of Artificial Intelligence Paper

The methods for dealing with problems, such as relying on big data analysis, Dr. Watson can provide new treatment methods and skill ranges that minimize harm to patients, thus enriching human methods for dealing with various problems. Artificial intelligence has also expanded the scope of human knowledge and skills, such as obtaining various new knowledge and information based on big data analysis, making it difficult for people to predict floods The accuracy of predicting disasters such as earthquakes has greatly improved, making the constraints on humanity in the face of nature stronger.

10. Materials on the pros and cons of artificial intelligence

Of course, at the same time, some people are worried that work will be replaced by artificial intelligence and lead to unemployment. In fact, just like before the Industrial Revolution, we cannot imagine that changes in professional artificial intelligence such as train drivers and computer engineering will take away some positions, but also bring more updated positions, minimizing the drawbacks that technology brings to humanity.

The development that artificial intelligence brings to humanity is disruptive, and its benefits even exceed our imagination. We should not hinder the development of this technology by imposing fear of the unknown. In summary, we believe that artificial intelligence has more advantages than disadvantages for human development (4 minutes and 6 seconds). On the other hand, hello everyone present.

The other party's argument is indeed beautiful, but there are many loopholes hidden behind the beautiful argument. First, let's clarify a few points: firstly, our topic today is a comparative proposition, but the other party's argument only mentions advantages and disadvantages from beginning to end, and even the relationship between size is not clear. What we want to argue is that artificial intelligence can replace the advantages brought by human development and is unnecessary; The drawbacks it brings to humanity are devastating and irreversible.

Secondly, artificial intelligence is divided into strong and weak artificial intelligence, first proposed by Saier. Weak artificial intelligence is a technological means that uses computers as powerful tools. Strong artificial intelligence advocates that artificial intelligence must ultimately fully simulate human psychology and intelligent activities. The biggest difference between artificial intelligence and other artificial tools is that it has the potential to self react to the external environment, This ability that was originally only possessed by humans once again... human development, because this is the inherent meaning of the existence of the human race.

The inevitability of human development finally raises a question, what is the value of human existence? The value of a person lies in meeting their own needs and making contributions to society. According to Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory, the highest demand of a person is self realization. Self realization refers to the realization of personal ideals and aspirations, the maximization of personal abilities, and the pursuit of the realization of this demand is the meaning of human existence.

Okay, based on the above points, the ultimate result of the development of artificial intelligence contradicts the significance of human existence. Therefore, we insist on the view that artificial intelligence has more disadvantages than advantages for human development. From the following aspects, we can discuss our viewpoint. Firstly, the current highly developed weak artificial intelligence has a comprehensive alienation effect on humans.

The alienation effect originated from Marx, where human creations are detached from the human subject, not only breaking free from human control, but also in turn exerting counter control over humanity, violating human will, and becoming an opposing force that enslaves and dominates people. Is this development what humans want to see?.

Secondly, the other party mentioned the unemployment wave, which is great. I want to tell you that the unemployment wave brought about by artificial intelligence is completely different from any unemployment wave brought about by the industrial revolution. It has brought about the unemployment wave, but the most frightening thing is that artificial intelligence itself generates huge commercial benefits, and humans are not supported by artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence supports humans, and humans meet the basic needs of Maslow's theory, Do humans really have the motivation to pursue greater goals? Do they still have the motivation to pursue self actualization? Or is it just pure idleness all day, and drunkenness and dreams.

Finally, based on the inevitability of human development and the characteristics of strong artificial intelligence, even if artificial intelligence has no intention of destroying humanity, they will gradually develop due to human, We still talk about the advantages of artificial intelligence over the disadvantages. Isn't it strange for the other party to argue with friends? Moreover, it cannot be guaranteed that artificial intelligence is completely under human control.

In summary, we believe that artificial intelligence has more disadvantages than advantages for human development (4 minutes and 13 seconds). Argument 2: Thank you, Chairman. Greetings to everyone present. First, let's take a look at the other party's brilliant remarks and what arguments have been made to us. Firstly, the other party's argument suggests that artificial intelligence can replace humans. However, let's think about it. Did the other party's argument focus on human intelligence? Have you created a divine species? But the reality is not like this.

The fundamental difference between artificial intelligence and human intelligence is that it does not have self-awareness. Everything it does, the purpose it performs, and what it wants to do are bestowed upon it by the creator of humanity, so there is no uncontrollability. The other party's debater can completely avoid worrying about the second point. The other party's debater told us about a concept of strong artificial intelligence, and whether the concept of strong artificial intelligence has been established, No matter how strong it is, just like today when our three debaters put their hair down and I also put it down, I imitated her, but I can never become her.

This is the ultimate essence of artificial intelligence. It can be infinitely close to humans, but cannot truly become the third point of humanity. I strongly agree with the argument from the other party. She said that the ultimate and fundamental meaning of our human existence is to continuously meet our own needs and realize our own value. Let's take a look at real life. Is artificial intelligence already meeting our needs in the process of gradual development? Is it constantly helping us realize our own value as a tool? For example, we usually drive to work and school, but I need to drive.

15. 20 minutes, but at this point, if artificial intelligence appears and replaces us in driving, the first point is that its safety performance is higher. It may cause traffic accidents when you are sleepy, but it won't. It is a machine. Secondly, during the process of replacing us in driving, can we save you time to read, listen to music, and rest? Is this better for our human development? Once we "didn't know the palace in the sky, what year is this evening", but with artificial intelligence, we "can go up to nine days to catch the moon, and down to five oceans to catch turtles". Does this change still mean that other debaters still think it's not human development? Even if our generation still cannot deeply appreciate the idea of "hoeing the grain at noon, sweat dripping down the soil", but we have a free and unrestrained mindset of "a thousand rivers with water, a thousand rivers with moon, a thousand miles without clouds, and a thousand miles with sky". Isn't this enough to become a driving force for human development? What is our motivation? We have enjoyed happiness and satisfaction in our existing lives, and we have seen room for development. Therefore, we have gained motivation and started to develop. Therefore, the emergence of artificial intelligence not only gives us motivation and meets our needs, but also may help us better complete a task and realize our self-worth.

In summary, it's just an artificial intelligence tool, don't be afraid (3 minutes and 15 seconds). Opponent 2 defense: Just now, the other party's main defense only mentioned the advantages and provided a large number of favorable examples, but did not mention any disadvantages. Isn't this a case of blind people imitating elephants, with the suspicion of one leaf obstructing the other's vision? Next, the other party's statement states that strong artificial intelligence will not appear in the future, and how do you absolutely believe that strong artificial intelligence will not appear in the future? Please provide us with strong evidence from the other party's defense friends.

Furthermore, from beginning to end, the other party has not proven that this is a comparative proposition. Is there any evidence that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of our side? I think the opponent's debaters have overlooked the following issues: firstly, artificial intelligence will in turn control humans, and humans will also be alienated. What is truly terrifying is not only that these artificial intelligence are divided into strong artificial intelligence and weak artificial intelligence. When strong artificial intelligence reaches a certain level, it will generate a self-awareness and promote its continuous development. However, Google's research director said, "The learning of artificial intelligence is not code, but more like a driving force, But humans can see some things inside and have some understanding of the things inside, but we cannot see the whole picture.

So I would like to ask the other party's debater, you cannot fully understand artificial intelligence, how can it develop? If one day it develops to a higher level than you, and it wants to eliminate humans who are lower than itself, and when humans no longer exist, why should the opponent argue that artificial intelligence has more advantages than disadvantages for human development? Secondly, Marx mentioned in "The Six Technical Paradoxes of Capitalism" that machines have the magical power to reduce human labor and make labor more effective, but they also cause excessive hunger and fatigue as a result.

In the past industrial revolution, the replacement of labor positions was carried out between people, but now, human positions have been replaced by artificial intelligence. So, I would like to ask the opponent's defense friends, those suffering humans, those replaced by artificial intelligence, where should they go? In limited positions, humans have been replaced by artificial intelligence, Can it be said that the development of artificial intelligence is beneficial for human development? However, being laid off is not the most terrifying thing.

Because artificial intelligence can generate enormous commercial value and support those who are laid off and those who are human, I would like to ask the other party again. Once artificial intelligence is used to support humans and humans meet the basic needs of Maslow, will humans still have the motivation to pursue higher goals? Will it still create a sense of laziness, drunkenness, and decadence? As humans, don't you think living like this is very sad?.

Thirdly, should we endow artificial intelligence with human rights? This is a very thought-provoking question. When artificial intelligence works in its job, perhaps it makes some small mistakes, being ruthlessly unplugged and deprived of its freedom and equality. Is this fair to it? In fact, when we think about this issue, we have already endowed it with a human right. Is this the question we should consider? Finally, I would like to ask the other party's debaters to answer the questions we have raised one by one.

Thank you, Chairman. Greetings to everyone present. First of all, I noticed a problem during the brilliant defense by the opposing debater, which is that they have not fully understood the definition of artificial intelligence. Our side has repeatedly explained that it is artificial intelligence, not human intelligence. Just now, the opposing debater has said so much, giving me the feeling that they are only fans of science fiction.

They mentioned that artificial intelligence may one day destroy humans, but have you ever thought about it? Artificial intelligence has no autonomous consciousness, no subjective world, and no emotional source. That is to say, compared to the tools we have used before, artificial intelligence can only simulate human thinking. Does this mean that it can control humans? No, it is not.

Artificial intelligence, as a tool, is used by people, and we all know that people have a tendency to seek benefits and avoid harm. How can it create something that threatens human existence? How can I clearly hear our debaters talking about the issue of unemployment when they exaggerate the definition of artificial intelligence and repeatedly say that our debaters did not emphasize the pros and cons? They just said it was a comparative proposition, but after all you've said, we haven't heard where the benefits lie.

Moreover, the other party's debater also mentioned work issues, and artificial intelligence may replace people's work, causing them to be lazy and only seek pleasure. May I ask the other party's debater that you are subjectively praising the laziness of adults in this aspect? As humans, do we have to live "facing the yellow earth and back to the sky", or should we pursue a freedom that is "cloudless and boundless".

With artificial intelligence, we can free ourselves from tedious and even complex tasks, and then pursue the freedom that humans desire and the value of humanity. Moreover, when the other party's debaters talk about the issue of expected work, I would like to say that they only hope for some rational things and cannot expect humanistic things. Just like the judges and teachers present here, is it possible for artificial intelligence to judge who wins or loses a debate? No way.

Furthermore, the opponent's debater also said that artificial intelligence is a tool, so is it possible for this tool to rule the world? The other party's defense friend, we have repeatedly emphasized that artificial intelligence does not have subjective consciousness, which means that artificial intelligence is just a tool for humans. From the first chess player in 1959 to the Erfa dog, and then to the strongest brain in Xiaodu, we all know that the relationship between artificial intelligence and humans is a gradual learning relationship. In our common progress, we defeated the Erfa dog, What we want is to find a new method from the field of Erfa dog thinking to defeat Erfa dog and then break through human rational thinking.

That is to say, the weakening of human thinking mentioned by the opponent's defense friend is actually not valid. Through artificial intelligence, people can use it as a tool to promote their rational progress. Overall, we believe that artificial intelligence has more advantages than disadvantages for human development. Defense 3: The opponent's defense friend has never been able to identify the circle of weak artificial intelligence. Do you know what strong artificial intelligence is? Do you know what deep learning is? What is the basic experience of science? Nothing is impossible. Human beings can know everything, but the other party clearly classified us as agnosticism, or not all unknowns, and believed that artificial intelligence无稽之谈，那么绝无可能，请说明你们的依据。

如果对方连未来的设想都没有，请问谈什么发展，我们说的无异于弱人工智能在我们现代的益处如果一切的目光短浅的话，如果一切都只着眼于眼前的“一亩三分地”的话，不去考虑后代和未来人类的发展，我们要展望未来啊而且刚才对方一直在讲经济发展，可是我们辩题是什么，是人类发展。

联合国历年人类发展报告述评更加关注的是人的发展与人权的关系所以我们下面讲的是，人不可忽视的是人权与伦理的关系，人是有道德、有思想、有原则的，我们不能在没有原则的基础下愚昧地追求财富和经济在伦理人权的基础上的人类发展才能称之为人类发展，而不是动物的发展。

那么我想问有一定程度支配的机器人能否给予人权呢？人工智能可以帮助人们解决难题，这是利处之一，可是你们有没有考虑过，它给人类制造了更多问题人工智能机器人是人造出来的，那我们假设如果它出现了问题，我们的责任应该归给谁？是机器人，还是机器人的制造者，还是机器人的设计者，这些对方辩友没有明确的标准。

而且人工智能与过去的工具有本质的差异以前的工具不过是工具，人类以最引以为傲的智能去操控它们，可是现在智能出现了强人工智能，刚才对方一直忽视的就是强人工智能，而一直在讲弱人工智能的利处可是我们看问题要看全面啊，你怎么确定未来不会有强人工智能出现呢？你的依据在哪儿？对方怎么可以这么有把握地告诉我，人工智能的技术能够被我们一直牢牢地控制呢？对于异域可控性你有把握吗？。

人工智能分为弱人工智能和强人工智能，而目前普及的都是弱人工智能，而对方刚才说的也都是弱人工智能他们很厉害，直接否认了强人工智能的发展所以我方坚决认为是弊大于利的请对方回应我方问题正方4辩：谢谢主席，问候在座各位。

首先对方辩友不用担心，我们也很认真，但对方辩友是不是不够认真为什么？因为探索深海，探索地核，探索外太空等就是强人工智能，甚至更进一步，它有可能是超人工智能看你说人类可以“上五天揽月，下九洋捉鳖”吗？当然不行，我方一直在谈强人工智能，为什么您方听不懂，我想您方对人工智能的定义都搞不清。

您方说人工智能可能会有思想和情感我告诉你为什么这是不可能这是因为人工智能是建立在数学、统计学与逻辑学基础上，它是用神经元网络进行分析、学习、预测的一项本质的人工开发的程序与软件人的自我意识并不是生来就有，更何况一个工具呢？。

今天对方辩友说人工智能让我们丧失也很多选择的权利对方结辩同学你也不用担心，你要是想扫大街人工智能也不会拦着你，你要是想种地人工智能也不会拦着你，可是我想探索这个星系呢，想知道这个世界更多的奥秘呢？我只有和人工智能在一起我才能做到这一些。

所以人选择权利在这个过程中其实是被扩大了的，而不是被缩小了的今天对方辩友说马斯洛需求被满足后人就无法实现自我价值，可是对方辩友您如今这么健康地坐着我面前，您的马斯洛需求的基本需求没有被满足吗？那么今天您在这里同我辩论，难道您的自我价值没有得到实现吗？基本需求的实现与人的自我价值的不可实现根本不具有对等性。

这点在座所有人都应该有共同认知正是因为我们不想做温水煮青蛙，不想被外星人占领，不想被黑暗森林占领，我们不想守着我们眼前的一亩三分地，所以人类才要谈发展而且对方辩友整场辩论中似乎都很担心人类会被替代这个问题，可你们忽视了人本身。

人类的角色不仅来自于方法论，更来自于世界观，所以人类是建立在一定的伦理道德、社会秩序的基础上去运转的，而人工智能只是机器，它根本不存在伦理道德的问题今天我们讨论这种利弊比较，其实就是人在思考价值的多少，这是人才独有的价值判断。

就人工智能单纯追求效率这一个属性而言，它永远不可能替代人类大千世界不止有逻辑和规律，更有情感和关怀这个世界关于爱，关于人与人之间的温度，逻辑永远不能解决，而人工智能也永远不能替代人类与动物的本质区别是什么？历史知识考点都告诉我们在于人类对于工具的创造和使用。

从刀耕火种到信息时代，从导弹核能到人工智能，我们每一个个体都在工具的使用中实现着对自我的突破和发展，我们创造了更多的价值才推动人类的发展曾经“路漫漫其修远兮”，我们知道的事情很少，能做的事情很小，人类必须上下而求索。

但人工智能的出现给我们提供了一种潜在的可能，接下我们现有的生存重任，去带领我们去探索未知世界所以人类其实有了更多选择的权利和更大的自由，纵使任何新事物的产生都不可能完美，我方一直也在强调这点，人工智能也一定会有诸多弊端，但这些都是暂时的、可解决的，人工智能只是工具，我们一再强调是在人类道德基准范围内与人工智能一道实现对于工作种类上限的突破，从最大程度去解放人，从而推动人类的理性发展。

“沉舟侧畔千帆过，病树前头万木春”，对方辩友，不要害怕，在技术的更新与进步中，人工智能对人类发展定是利多于弊反方四辩：我们为什么要辩这个辩题，不是为了争输赢，而是为了跳出来，跳出来审视一下这个时代正在发展的人工智能对我们的利、对我们的弊。

难道说对方辩友举四个、举九个、举十一个利的例子，然后举一个弊的例子，就可以证明人工智能对人类发展是利大于弊的吗？可以吗？不可以我们先来审视一下这个东西人工智能不仅仅是弱人工智能，它不是单纯的机器人，它未来可以有思想，可以有情感，如果你觉得它没有，你证明，如果你它不能证明，你连未来的事情都不知道，或者说你不知道它未来会发展到什么样子，你连一个工具它未来会发展成什么样子，或者说什么方向都不知道，太可悲了，我是很认真的。

为什么我们要辩人工智能，它现在是一个什么东西，它确确实实可以替代一些多重复、高劳力的一些简单的工作那对方一辩说会促进社会发展，那人呢？你的父亲、你的母亲，我们大家，在座各位都不是被替代的人，所以我们可以很开心说出来他们代替那些多重复、低劳动力工作的岗位，但是那些被替代的人呢？而且这不是人与人之间的被替代，我有工业革命，你说没有关系，你有了新的司机，你可以开车，但是人工智能不一样，它代替了人之后，这个岗位对于人就彻底没有了，它拒绝了他，否定了人，人的价值在哪里？那些被代替的人，他们的价值在哪里？那我们呢？随着他们的发展，他们可以进一步代替越来越多的工作。

而且确实现在的人工智能没有情感，但是人工智能越来越可以做很多很多跟人一样的事情，你可以把它当行为人，你会有情感的，你还会舍得让这些人去排爆吗？去下五洋捉鳖吗？去太空揽月吗？你舍得吗？我们换一个点，我们讲它弊大于利，是因为我们承认它确实能促进经济发展，但这并不是对人。

第一个点，它对隐私的破坏权，你有没有注意到，你的社会发展，你的生活中充斥着各种各样的人工智能，但你没有注意到，举个很简单的例子，网络浏览助手，它可以在线记录你的各种各样的喜欢的常去的网站，然后在下一秒你要输的时候跳出来，排个序，很开心，很人性化，你的技术也很智能化，很人性化，但是它会把这些数据传到远方的数据库里面去。

但人工智能并不能智能地分别谁在使用这些数据，它仅仅是一个操控者我们可以再继续，它会动摇人的主体性地位，就是我们作为人的价值被它所替代我们会失去我们的价值，是真真正正地失去你譬如说它解放了人，把人从繁琐的劳动中解放了出来，你为什么不想一下，这个解放是我们愿意的解放吗？我们人之所以为人的根本是我们能够选择，选择我们不愿意或者愿意做的事情。

但是人工智能它不一样，它代替了这个事情之后，这个选项就没有了，你不可主动选，以前我们可以主动选择，我可以不去扫大街，我可以不去看书，但是我可以去思考，我可以去做个选择但人工智能普及以后呢？你只能选择去做一些文艺的工作，因为这些工作是人工智能所不能做的，也就是说你的价值、你的意义变成了我们只能做一些人工智能不能做的，我们人，人之所以为人不是这样的。

很可怜所以说人工智能对于世人，对我们主体性人，一定要动摇他的主体性地位，这才是它的弊端，这才是我们说它弊大于利的地方本文由语文月刊公众号ID：yuwenyuekan 编辑整理，转载请注明出处)欢迎原创投稿，打赏全归作者，阅读量大另有稿酬。

投稿邮箱：120156131@qq.com,请注明“原创”字样。商务合作：QQ120156131

【请关注语文月刊公众号yuwenyuekan】即时消息关注“语文月刊”微博，多转发、分享给朋友！